Read any good books lately? Looked at the authors? Just bring that soapbox a little closer, please, I feel the need to waffle…
When we read an author who thinks as we do there is the understandable tendency to say to oneself “This writer’s on the money. Got it just right, beautiful characterisation. Must have a wealth of wisdom and understanding of the human condition. Well done, that person.”
Or something similar, because our yardstick is us and our own experiences.
Spotting a dud is also pretty straightforward but we sometimes let them go through to the keeper if we are happy to go along for the ride. ‘I’m chasing a bad guy, it’s night and he’s homicidal. Gee, this dark alley looks like it could be just the thing; I’ll nip down barehanded and see if he’s nearby.’
Too many groans and the book slides to the floor, joining the choir indivisible of novels.
Almost there, hang on a bit….
But then there are the books which some of us just love while the rest of humanity looks on askance. Que?
Particularly major characters.
Is it… drum roll while I duck for cover…something to do with the sex of the author?
Do males write ripping yarns which the blokes think are just spiffing while the gentler sex wonders when we lost our marbles.
And do the ladies stretch out a yarn with major characters to die for, with lots of chaps quite willing to help them on their way?
It could have something to do with our shared cultural experience and upbringing. Nature and nurture combining to make us a bit fat headed when it comes to writing a fully rounded character.
So blokes write one dimensional characters with bits of biffo and stern gazes; the wimmen have heroic pale youths with smouldering looks and flowing locks.
And if we like that sort of stuff then the story makes perfect sense. Of course, to the rest of the world the storyline, characterisation and plot all look a bit, well, naff.
Not saying, and let me make this perfectly clear, that all male writers churn out this stuff; nor am I saying that all female writers only populate their novels with heartfelt wusses.
What I am saying – put that rock down, please, madam – is that a writer must be very wary when constructing a character. A good writer – male or female – generates a real human being, someone that we can identify. Warts and all.
So when we are reading a novel which has received rave reviews but which we just don’t get – it may be because we are hamstrung by our own prejudices, our own expectations.
I was shamelessly eavesdropping on a conversation of my colleagues – a dreadful habit which it took me years to cultivate – and they were discussing the reaction of some of our pallid youth to a recent play. A well known play, it’s been around the block a few times, it’s got cred. Trust me on this.
Said juveniles were dismissing the main male character as being not right, wasn’t a major player, author got it all wrong. The actor was, of course, a cretin for playing the alpha male this way. When asked to expand upon their thesis (and I’m paraphrasing here, grunts and raised eyes were the norm) they said that the main character should be like Edward from Twilight.
‘Cause that’s what heroes look like/talk like/smell like/should be.
John Proctor should be a vampire.
There, I’ve said it.
You dunno whether to laugh or cry, but I shall fall back on some infallible advice once uttered by Neddy Seagoon – a man who’s take on life I have often admired.
“Right! It’s around the back for a quick brandy!”
I’m right behind you Ned.
Filed under: This Human Condition, This Writing World | 7 Comments »